Assessing the Quality of Work Life for Women Officers in Higher Education Institutions


  • M. A. Sikandar Department of Management and Commerce, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India 500032
  • Anita Sikandar Department of Commerce, Shyam Lal College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India 110032



Quality of work life, Employee autonomy, Employee commitment, Employee development, Higher education


Quality of Work Life (QWL) is a tool to evaluate the current work conditions and reflects performance, productivity and the quality of output by an employee at the workplace. It also reflects the effectiveness of the job roles of an employee in an organization. Traditionally the education sector is considered a better workplace for women, yet there exists a glass ceiling and barriers that hinder their career progression and occupy challenging tasks at the top level in some organizations. The present study explores the QWL of women officers working in selected publicly funded Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) in India on nine dimensions identified based on the literature review. A structured questionnaire was developed, and the primary data with a sample size of 320 university officers with 75 women respondents from nine selected central universities of India were collected. The study results indicated that the respondents enjoyed a fair treatment at the workplace, autonomy at work, and good reporting relationship besides the -work-life balance.

Author Biographies

M. A. Sikandar, Department of Management and Commerce, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India 500032

Dr. M. A. Sikandar is an Associate Professor in the Department of Management and Commerce at Maulana Azad National Urdu University, a Central University in Hyderabad, India. He teaches MBA and Ph.D. students in the areas of employee relations, strategic management, corporate governance, and business and industrial laws. Prior to taking up teaching, he held senior positions in the government and worked as a practicing manager for more than two decades.


Anita Sikandar, Department of Commerce, Shyam Lal College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India 110032

Dr. Anita Sikandar is a dedicated teacher with a decade of experience teaching undergraduate students in the Department of Commerce at Shyam Lal College, University of Delhi, India. Her research interests lie in the field of organizational behavior, with a focus on quality of work-life and work culture. She has authored several research papers on these topics in reputed national and international journals.


L. W. Porter and E. E. Lawler, Industrial organizations and health. Routledge, 2013. doi:

S. E. Seashore and T. D. Taber, Job satisfaction indicators and their correlates, “American Behavioral Scientist,” 18 (3), pp. 333–368, 1975, doi:

W. E. Knutson, K. K., W. E. Kiernan, and K. Knutson, Quality of work life. 1990.

H. C. Carlson, A model of quality of work life as a developmental process, “Education + Training,” 25 (1), pp. 27–32, 1983, doi:

D. A. Nadler and E. E. Lawler, Quality of work life: perspectives and directions, “Organizational Dynamics,” 11 (3), pp. 20–30, 1983, doi:

E. Kerce and S. Booth-Kewley, Quality of work life surveys in organizations: Methods and benefits, in Improving organizational surveys: New directions, methods, and applications, Sage Publications, 1993, pp. 188–209.

J.-P. Martel and G. Dupuis, Quality of work life: theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument, “Social Indicators Research,” 77 (2), pp. 333–368, 2006, doi:

R. J. Burke, Some antecedents and consequences of work^family conflict, “Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,” 3 (4), pp. 287–302, 1988.

J. H. Greenhaus and N. J. Beutell, Sources of conflict between work and family roles, “The Academy of Management Review,” 10 (1), p. 76, 1985, doi:

G. A. Adams, L. A. King, and D. W. King, Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work–family conflict with job and life satisfaction., “Journal of Applied Psychology,” 81 (4), pp. 411–420, 1996, doi:

L. Bailyn, Issues of work and family in different national contexts: How the United States, Britain, and Sweden respond, “Human Resource Management,” 31 (3), pp. 201–208, 1992, doi:

S. Md‐Sidin, M. Sambasivan, and I. Ismail, Relationship between work‐family conflict and quality of life, “Journal of Managerial Psychology,” 25 (1), pp. 58–81, 2010, doi:

J. Jeffrey, k; Abdallah, S; Michaelson, Well-being at work | New Economics Foundation, Nef Publications, 2014.

D. Angrave and A. Charlwood, What is the relationship between long working hours, over-employment, under-employment and the subjective well-being of workers? Longitudinal evidence from the UK, “Human Relations,” 68 (9), pp. 1491–1515, 2015, doi:

Ellen E. Kossek, Suzan Lewis, and Leslie B. Hammer, Work—life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream, “Human Relations,” 63 (1), pp. 3–19, 2010.

J. Heyes and M. Tomlinson, Underemployment and well-being in Europe, “Human Relations,” 74 (8), pp. 1240–1266, 2021, doi:

A. Azarbouyeh and S. G. Jalali Naini, A study on the effect of teleworking on quality of work life, “Management Science Letters,” 4 (6), pp. 1063–1068, 2014, doi:

D. Irawanto, K. Novianti, and K. Roz, Work from home: measuring satisfaction between work–life balance and work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, “Economies,” 9 (3), p. 96, 2021, doi:

E. Battisti, S. Alfiero, and E. Leonidou, Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees, “Journal of Business Research,” 150, pp. 38–50, 2022, doi:

D. Gallie, Direct participation and the quality of work, “Human Relations,” 66 (4), pp. 453–473, 2013, doi:

International Labor Organization, Empowering women at work: company policies and practices for gender equality, 2020.

Indian Journal of Public Administration, National Policy for the Empowerment of Women (2001), “Indian Journal of Public Administration,” 60 (3), pp. 730–740, 2014, doi:

M. A. Sikandar and P. F. Rahman, Edtech start-ups in the education ecosystem in the post-COVID-19 era in India, “Towards Excellence,” pp. 914–921, 2021, doi:

J. Kaur, P. Verma, and S. Bajoria, SASHAKT: A job portal for women using text extraction and text summarization, “Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management,” 1 (2), pp. 22–29, 2022, doi:

D. Woodward, Work‐life balancing strategies used by women managers in British “modern” universities, “Equal Opportunities International,” 26 (1), pp. 6–17, 2007, doi:

D. A. Cotter, J. M. Hermsen, S. Ovadia, and R. Vanneman, The Glass Ceiling Effect, “Social Forces,” 80 (2), pp. 655–681, 2001, doi:

S. Fernandez and T. Moldogaziev, Employee empowerment, employee attitudes, and performance: testing a causal model, “Public Administration Review,” 73 (3), pp. 490–506, 2013, doi:

M. Mousa et al., Advancing women in healthcare leadership: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of multi-sector evidence on organisational interventions, “EClinicalMedicine,” 39, p. 101084, 2021, doi:

K. Joyner and A. Preston, Gender differences in perceptions of leadership role, performance and culture in a university: A case study, “International Review of Women and Leadership,” 4 (2), pp. 34–43, 1998.

E. Ramsay, Facing international challenges and maximizing opportunities., 2000.

Richard E. Walton, Quality of working life: what is it?, “Sloan Management Review,” 15 (1), pp. 11–21, 1973.




How to Cite

Sikandar, M. A., & Sikandar, A. (2023). Assessing the Quality of Work Life for Women Officers in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management, 2(1), 01–06.



Research Articles