Sensor-Driven Architecture for Resource-Efficient Hydroponic NFT Vertical Farming

A Simulation-Based Controller Evaluation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57159/jcmm.5.4.261351

Keywords:

Vertical Farming, Hydroponics, Model-Predictive Control, Lettuce

Abstract

Urbanization and freshwater stress are intensifying pressure on conventional food systems, motivating closed-environment production. This Short Communication specifies a sensor-driven architecture for hydroponic nutrient film technique (NFT) leafy-green production, comprising an in-situ sensing layer, a three-tier Internet of Things (IoT) data path, and a gradient-boosted decision-tree (GBDT) scheduler. The architecture is evaluated in a coupled lettuce-growth and room-climate simulator built on the Van Henten crop model. Three controllers were compared over a single 14-day trajectory under one fixed seed. The GBDT scheduler holds the room inside the target envelope 75.8 percent of the time at 91.3 kWh per day, against a rule-based hysteresis baseline (15.6 percent, 140.1 kWh per day) and a Ziegler-Nichols-tuned proportional-integral-derivative (PID) reference (77.9 percent, 96.8 kWh per day). On a combined cost J = 10(1 - a) + 0.05E, the scheduler reduces the hysteresis cost by 55 percent, while it and the tuned PID differ by 1.0 percent (6.98 against 7.05), a gap a single replicate cannot resolve. Reported predictor coefficient-of-determination values describe in-distribution quality on simulator-generated data, not generalization to physical sensors. Avoiding a per-installation relay auto-tune step is the design rationale and is not tested here.

References

[1] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, "World urbanization prospects 2025: Summary of results," Tech. Rep. UN DESA/POP/2025/TR/NO. 12, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 2025.

[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, "The state of the world's land and water resources for food and agriculture: Systems at breaking point," tech. rep., FAO, Rome, Italy, 2021.

[3] F. Kalantari, O. M. Tahir, R. A. Joni, and E. Fatemi, "Opportunities and challenges in sustainability of vertical farming: A review," Journal of Landscape Ecology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35-60, 2018.

[4] K. Benke and B. Tomkins, "Future food-production systems: Vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture," Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13-26, 2017.

[5] G. L. Barbosa, F. D. A. Gadelha, N. Kublik, A. Proctor, L. Reichelm, E. Weissinger, G. M. Wohlleb, and R. U. Halden, "Comparison of land, water, and energy requirements of lettuce grown using hydroponic vs. conventional agricultural methods," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 6879-6891, 2015.

[6] L. Graamans, E. Baeza, A. van den Dobbelsteen, I. Tsafaras, and C. Stanghellini, "Plant factories versus greenhouses: Comparison of resource use efficiency," Agricultural Systems, vol. 160, pp. 31-43, 2018.

[7] M. Martin and E. Molin, "Environmental assessment of an urban vertical hydroponic farming system in Sweden," Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 4124, 2019.

[8] T. Kozai, G. Niu, and M. Takagaki, Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production. London, U.K.: Academic Press (Elsevier), 2nd ed., 2019.

[9] M. SharathKumar, E. Heuvelink, and L. F. M. Marcelis, "Vertical farming: Moving from genetic to environmental modification," Trends in Plant Science, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 724-727, 2020.

[10] A. Tzounis, N. Katsoulas, T. Bartzanas, and C. Kittas, "Internet of things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges," Biosystems Engineering, vol. 164, pp. 31-48, 2017.

[11] K. Tatas, A. Al-Zoubi, N. Christofides, C. Zannettis, M. Chrysostomou, S. Panteli, and A. Antoniou, "Reliable IoT-based monitoring and control of hydroponic systems," Technologies, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 26, 2022.

[12] W. Rofiansyah, F. R. Zalianty, F. A. L. Ito, I. Wijayanto, H. H. Ryanu, and I. D. Irawati, "IoT-based control and monitoring system for hydroponic plant growth using image processing and mobile applications," PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 11, p. e2763, 2025.

[13] G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T.-Y. Liu, "LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), pp. 3146-3154, 2017.

[14] LightGBM Project, "LightGBM documentation." 2026. Accessed: May 2026.

[15] L. Benos, A. C. Tagarakis, G. Dolias, R. Berruto, D. Kateris, and D. Bochtis, "Machine learning in agriculture: A comprehensive updated review," Sensors, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 3758, 2021.

[16] M. A. Adesanya, H. Obasekore, A. Rabiu, W.-H. Na, Q. O. Ogunlowo, T. D. Akpenpuun, M.-H. Kim, H.-T. Kim, B.-Y. Kang, and H.-W. Lee, "Deep reinforcement learning for PID parameter tuning in greenhouse HVAC system energy optimization: A TRNSYS-Python co-simulation approach," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 252, p. 124126, 2024.

[17] E. J. van Henten, "Validation of a dynamic lettuce growth model for greenhouse climate control," Agricultural Systems, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 55-72, 1994.

[18] A. M. Law, Simulation Modeling and Analysis. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 5th ed., 2015.

[19] T. Monks, C. S. M. Currie, B. S. Onggo, S. Robinson, M. Kunc, and S. J. E. Taylor, "Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies: Introducing the STRESS guidelines," Journal of Simulation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55-67, 2019.

[20] G. Pennisi, G. Gianquinto, L. F. M. Marcelis, M. Martin, and F. Orsini, "Vertical farming: Productivity, environmental impact, and resource use. a review," Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 45, no. 5, p. 57, 2025.

[21] M.-H. Talbot and D. Monfet, "Development of a crop growth model for the energy analysis of controlled agriculture environment spaces," Biosystems Engineering, vol. 238, pp. 38-50, 2024.

[22] D. Xu, H. A. Ahmed, Y. Tong, Q. Yang, and L. G. van Willigenburg, "Optimal control as a tool to investigate the profitability of a Chinese plant factory: Lettuce production system," Biosystems Engineering, vol. 208, pp. 319-332, 2021.

[23] M. Abedi, X. Tan, E. J. Stallknecht, E. S. Runkle, J. F. Klausner, M. S. Murillo, and A. Bénard, "Incorporating the effect of the photon spectrum on biomass accumulation of lettuce using a dynamic growth model," Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 14, p. 1106576, 2023.

[24] W. Jin, D. Formiga Lopez, E. Heuvelink, and L. F. M. Marcelis, "Light use efficiency of lettuce cultivation in vertical farms compared with greenhouse and field," Food and Energy Security, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e391, 2023.

JCMM Volume 5 Issue 4 cover, Article Number 261351: Sensor-Driven Architecture for Resource-Efficient Hydroponic NFT Vertical Farming: A Simulation-Based Controller Evaluation

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Singh, S., Unhelkar, B., & Chakrabarti, P. (2026). Sensor-Driven Architecture for Resource-Efficient Hydroponic NFT Vertical Farming: A Simulation-Based Controller Evaluation. Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management, 5(4), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.57159/jcmm.5.4.261351